Overwatch
SV81
COVER · IGDB
ShooterStrategyPS4PCXONESwitch

Overwatch

Most streamers rate Overwatch worth playing.

7 streamer verdicts· Released 2016-05-24
—
Aggregate /100
5 stated, 2 derived
All-time average · n=7· Last review 2016-09

Independent creators only · sponsored coverage never counts

81English (7)
Global VerdictPersonalize →

Streamer Verdicts

7 displayed
SsethTzeentach
SsethTzeentachVERDICTEnglish

Our analysis

He roasts Overwatch's modes, maps, heroes, and reliance on teammates, yet closes by saying he loves it. The final verdict embraces the same frustrations that fuel the review's satire.

Watch
Downward Thrust
Downward ThrustVERDICTEnglish

Our analysis

Polished team arena shooter with rich lore but excessive casual catering and limited content.

Watch
ACG
ACGVERDICTEnglish

Our analysis

ACG verdict: Buy. Most gamers will get their money's worth and then some.

Watch
Worth A Buy
Worth A BuyVERDICTEnglish

Our analysis

Worth buying — a brilliant, highly polished team-based shooter that rewards tactical thinking over individual kills. Its 21 distinct heroes let you swap on the fly to counter the enemy's setup, and the objective modes plus deep team coordination give it surprising depth beneath a deceptively shallow surface. The excellent options and accessible, casual feel are strong positives; some heroes feel overpowered and loot boxes are present, but the cosmetic-only contents make that a non-issue.

Watch
The Escapist
The EscapistVERDICTOrgEnglish
Recommendour band 70–84

Our analysis

In a head-to-head against Battleborn, Overwatch is plainly the more fun of the two hero shooters, throwing all its content and characters at you immediately and offering a practice range to learn each hero, whose three or four refined skills make them excel at one role. The downsides are the lack of any real story beyond a website blurb, cynically focus-grouped archetype characters, and a stingy cosmetic-only loot system — plus reservations about full price with microtransactions on top for a multiplayer-only game.

Watch
AngryJoeShow
AngryJoeShowVERDICTEnglish

Our analysis

A highly polished, addictive and genuinely fun casual shooter that is best in short bursts and welcoming to all skill levels, with 21 expertly crafted heroes as its greatest strength and excellent teamwork-encouraging design. It is held back by being light on content — only a few modes, no meaningful PvE, no ranked at launch — plus some balance problems like stacking six of one hero, and random cosmetic loot boxes that feel wrong. At its premium price it comes across as overpriced and not the flawless game many claimed.

Watch
Eurogamer
EurogamerVERDICTOrgEnglishPlayed on PC
Must playour band 85–95

Our analysis

A joyful, endlessly replayable arena shooter that, while heavily inspired by Team Fortress 2 and '90s shooters, perfects the feel of its 21 distinct heroes and their abilities. The standout is mid-match hero switching, which keeps composition and strategy fluid and rewards constant learning. Blizzard's responsive communication and ongoing balancing give confidence the meta will stay fresh, though there's mild worry the developer dialogue could dry up post-launch.

Watch

About

Released
2016-05-24
Genre
Shooter, Strategy

Methodology

Score aggregated from 7 trusted streamers monitored by StreamerVerdict.

Learn more

Creator Mentions · 1

👍 1 positive😐 0 mixed👎 0 negative
  • SomecallmeJohnnySomecallmeJohnny👍 positive

    Our analysis

    SomeCallMeJohnny praises Overwatch as an accessible and enjoyable team-based FPS with exceptional art direction, diverse and well-animated characters, and solid gameplay mechanics that reward both casual and dedicated players. He recommends it as a good entry point into the FPS genre, particularly for those looking for something bright and welcoming rather than the typical grittier shooter aesthetic.

    Watch